<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>miriku.com &#187; xp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://miriku.com/wp/tag/xp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://miriku.com/wp</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:09:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>work pair of dimes</title>
		<link>http://miriku.com/wp/2009/10/work-pair-of-dimes/</link>
		<comments>http://miriku.com/wp/2009/10/work-pair-of-dimes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 06:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.e</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miriku.com/wp/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[paradigms for work are often just "this is a set of rules that worked for me, a random person". don't be afraid to modify them as you see fit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>never forget that all the work paradigms that you&#8217;ve been ever taught or forced into (in case of programming, things like extreme programming or scrum) aren&#8217;t some sort of mathematically proven theorems or empirically checked models. they&#8217;re simply one guys idea of how a group should work, that happened to work in his group</p>
<p>if you find yourself constantly striving to match a paradigm, back up. maybe you&#8217;re not really meant to work that way. do you have something that works for you?</p>
<p>keep in mind though, some people really might not have a method that works, in which case anything that involves structure might be beneficial.</p>
<p>one random example from my own life: my email. i spent a stupid amount of time attempting to stay on top of sorting email because i was told at one point that organized email is important. i tried tags, rulesets in the hundreds, smart folders, all at the same time, and the results were dismal. best part? i never used it. i never once said to myself &#8220;oh, i need this communication from the prime minister of ukraine, let me look under &#8220;prime ministers&#8221;, tagged &#8220;ukraine&#8221; &#8220;. no, i&#8217;d just go to the search bar, click &#8220;From&#8221; and type ytymoshenko@gmail.com. ta-da.</p>
<p>new solution? 4 inboxes (i have 4 mail aggregating accounts), total of 2 regular folders marked &#8220;important&#8221; and &#8220;not&#8221;, and 1 smart folder. the rule for the smart folder is:<br />
- if the email is unread, or the email is in folder important, show it.</p>
<p>the only folder i look at is the smart folder. all unread emails are in there and disappear after they&#8217;re read (technically, they disappear after i close the window, which i do as soon as i&#8217;m done looking at mail), unless they&#8217;re something relevant in which case i drag them to the &#8220;important&#8221; folder. once they&#8217;re solved/answered, they&#8217;re dropped in either &#8220;not&#8221;. every blue moon i drag all emails from the inboxes to the &#8220;not&#8221; bin, just in case things go bad if the inbox gets too large.</p>
<p>that&#8217;s really all i need from email, it works with my actual work flow, and actually uses that CPU power this machine has. i imagine this would work even better with gmail, but at work we have lolexchange so eh.</p>
<p>different example of this: i have a bizarre music writing method. i work in these bursts where i write and record for about 5 hours straight, in which time i like to be alone with no one listening, then when done, i leave it alone for a week while sending it to half the people on my IM list to ask for opinions on what they think of it and where it should go</p>
<p>somehow the conversation process is what lets me mentally decide where it needs to go. it&#8217;s silly, but songs which i don&#8217;t talk about end up piling up as minute long fragments that never went anywhere. songs i do, end up growing into actual songs. well, not immediately. they go through a bunch of cycles of this. some more than others.</p>
<p>(btw, apologies if you happen to be on the &#8220;hey can you tell me if this works? what do you think of the cut up trumpet loop?&#8221; and are annoyed by it. just let me know, i wont be offended)</p>
<p>in any case, yes, don&#8217;t get obsessed with following footsteps of others, just set a similar goal to what they had and find what manner of movement works best for you. but don&#8217;t use that as an excuse to be lazy either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miriku.com/wp/2009/10/work-pair-of-dimes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
